http://robozen.com/technology/google-officially-owns-me/ Web innovation, entrepreneurship, usability Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:01:30 -0800 hourly 1 http://robozen.com/technology/google-officially-owns-me/comment-page-1/#comment-146 m Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:05:23 +0000 http://robozen.com/?p=102#comment-146 That was way too deep. That was way too deep.

]]> http://robozen.com/technology/google-officially-owns-me/comment-page-1/#comment-145 gth Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:32:36 +0000 http://robozen.com/?p=102#comment-145 I find it rather interesting that we should Rail - pun intended - at what the laws of mathmmatics and physics have to "teach" us. Remember what dBase technology is created upon. One-to-many, Many-to-one and Many-to-Many?!?!? Are we that "individualistic"? I have to admit, one thing that Google does not teach is what "a unified field theory" was to the genius who was trying to answer this question when he died. If you get my meaning! The "laws of nature" have alot to teach us. And we have to be thankful that we are not in the vicinity when it decides to do so, oftem as not. I don't know, just trying to answer to this post in an intelligent manner ... I find it rather interesting that we should Rail – pun intended – at what the laws of mathmmatics and physics have to “teach” us. Remember what dBase technology is created upon. One-to-many, Many-to-one and Many-to-Many?!?!? Are we that “individualistic”? I have to admit, one thing that Google does not teach is what “a unified field theory” was to the genius who was trying to answer this question when he died. If you get my meaning! The “laws of nature” have alot to teach us. And we have to be thankful that we are not in the vicinity when it decides to do so, oftem as not. I don’t know, just trying to answer to this post in an intelligent manner …

]]>